eGFI - Dream Up the Future Sign-up for The Newsletter  For Teachers Online Store Contact us Search
Read the Magazine
What's New?
Explore eGFI
Engineer your Path About eGFI
Autodesk - Change Your World
Overview E-tube Trailblazers Student Blog
  • Tag Cloud

  • What’s New?

  • Pages

  • RSS RSS

  • RSS Comments

  • Archives

  • Meta

Mass Transit Living Lab

TeachEngineering lesson contributed by the civil and environmental engineering department, Colorado School of Mines. 

A companion lesson for grades 6-10 from the California Academy of Sciences, Building Better Buses, focuses on alternative fuels and improving energy efficiency in public bus systems. Or play “Gridlock Buster,” the University of Minnesota’s traffic engineering game, with related K-12 lessons.

Summary

In this series of four activities, students in grades 9 to 12 analyze real-world traffic data to evaluate the efficiency of a section of a public transit system and suggest design improvements. They then evaluate whether the changes make positive impacts on the system’s performance. Note: This lesson uses Denver’s FasTracks Living Lab, a web portal to interactive train traffic data for a major metropolitan city, so students need access to computers and the Internet. Click HERE for FasTracks main website.

Grade level: 9-12

Time: 1 hour, 45 minutes or two 50-minute class periods

Engineering Connection

Transportation engineers are responsible for designing and operating the systems that deliver people and goods, including rail, buses, airplanes, trucks, highways, and roads. They aim to design efficient systems that move people and goods quickly, safely, and cost-effectively.

Learning Objectives

After this lesson, students should be able to:

  • Suggest design improvements and evaluate whether the changes make positive impacts on the transit system performance.
  • Evaluate whether a particular section of a transit system is functioning in an efficient manner and whether it is meeting design requirements.
  • Work with real-world data, prepare and interpret graphs, analyze various scenarios, and develop creative solutions to existing problems.

Learning Standards

Next Generation Science Standards

  • Use a computer simulation to model the impact of proposed solutions to a complex real-world problem with numerous criteria and constraints on interactions within and between systems relevant to the problem.

International Engineering and Technology Educators Association

  • Optimization is an ongoing process or methodology of designing or making a product and is dependent on criteria and constraints.
  • Quality control is a planned process to ensure that a product, service, or system meets established criteria.
  • Requirements of a design, such as criteria, constraints, and efficiency, sometimes compete with each other.

Common Core Mathematics Standards

  • Measurement & Data: Weigh the possible outcomes of a decision by assigning probabilities to payoff values and finding expected values.

Introduction/Motivation

The west corridor of the Mass Transit Living Lab citywide transit system may not be operating as effectively as it could be. Passengers want to be reassured that taking the train to work is better for them than driving their cars.

Conversely, the owners of Living Lab (the city) want to be sure the trains are providing the required passenger service in a cost-effective manner.

The city wants to hire you to work as engineering teams to assess the west corridor and determine if it is meeting design requirements. And if not, the city wants your teams to suggest and test some improvements to fix the system.

As an introductory activity, have students brainstorm ideas. Ask students these questions:

  • What do you know about flow rates?
  • What are examples of everyday situations in which it would be important to understand flow rate?

Lesson Background and Concepts for Teachers

Design Criteria: Whenever engineers are hired to develop new products (such as voice recognition software), design and build new structures (such as the Chunnel) or improve the day-to-day operations of organizations or processes (such as the flow of people at DisneyWorld), the first thing they do is determine the criteria for a successful design.

FasTracks Living Lab: Teachers need to have a fair working knowledge of the Mass Transit Living Lab (http://www.teachengineering.org/livinglabs/fastracks/) before implementing this lesson in the classroom. The brief online user’s guide helps to provide a better understanding of the Lab; however, the best way to learn is just to poke around! We recommended that you work through this lesson and its activities before implementing them in your class.

Associated Activities

Watch how school bus routes are planned in St. Cloud, Minnesota:

Lesson Closure

A great way to end this lesson is to have a class discussion about 1) what was wrong with the west corridor operation, and 2) the various recommendations of the different teams. It is beneficial to have peer-review and constructive criticism of student work – it is instant feedback and from a source other than the teacher.

Assessment

Grade the intermediate homework, final presentations or final reports. In addition, give students a scenario in which traffic demand increases substantially (such as before or after a Sunday downtown football game) and ask them to design changes to the system.

Lesson Extension Activities

The extensions are limitless. Have students perform similar analyses for other trains, stations, and routes, or collect data on school bus routes and recommend improvements.

Other Related Information

This lesson is designed around the Mass Transit Living Lab, a real-time simulation of FasTracks—a real, high-speed rail transit system in metropolitan Denver, Colorado, as an example for analyzing data about how a light rail system works.

Companion lesson (Grades 6-10): Building Better Buses, from the California Academy of Sciences, focuses on alternative fuels and improving energy efficiency in public bus systems.

Contributors

Mike Mooney; Stuart Fehr

© 2013 by Regents of the University of Colorado; original © 2005 Colorado School of Mines

Supporting Program

Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Colorado School of Mines

Acknowledgements

This curriculum was created with support from the National Science Foundation. However, these contents do not necessarily represent the policies of the National Science Foundation, and you should not assume endorsement by the federal government.

Comments or Questions?

By clicking the "Submit" button you agree to the eGFI Privacy Policy.